Why We Went All the Way to the Supreme Court

“To the thousands of sex workers we serve, this ruling could absolutely be hope for a better life!” —Darshana Vyas, Director of the Mukta project, Pathfinder International

"I have always been proud of Pathfinder's courage—its willingness to go where others fear to go, which is a legacy from our founders." —Cynthia Fields, Chairperson of the Board of Directors, Pathfinder International

“It is a historic victory for us, and also vindication of our stand that promoting safer sexual practices among sex workers for prevention of HIV did not mean promoting prostitution.” —Darshana Vyas, Director of the Mukta project, Pathfinder International

"The Brazilian Network of Sex Workers shared that 'the decision shows the importance of the judiciary in guaranteeing rights violated by the executive and other bodies.'” —Carlos Laudari, Pathfinder's Senior Technical Advisor, HIV Prevention

“We stay ready to continue our partnership with the US government and all others who work with us to deliver quality, high impact programs that reach those most at need and often denied access.” —Purnima Mane, President and CEO

“If we proceed with this lawsuit, we have to be all in.”

On the morning of November 29, 2005, Pathfinder International’s board of directors had to make a monumental decision of whether or not to sue the organization’s largest funder—the US Government.

Everyone at Pathfinder agreed that the “Anti-Prostitution Pledge”—a 2003 law requiring all groups receiving US Government funds for international HIV and AIDS work have a policy explicitly opposing prostitution—was damaging to public health. It could severely undermine efforts to prevent the spread of HIV worldwide by impeding organizations that work with key populations, and could intensify stigma and fear among sex workers, driving them further away from HIV education and prevention services.

Everyone at Pathfinder also agreed that the pledge violated free speech. While the government can dictate what can be done with its money, the pledge went far beyond that. It forced groups like Pathfinder to adopt an organization-wide policy, thereby restricting how they spend their own private funds to do HIV work.

All of this weighed heavily on Pathfinder staff and its board of directors. Yet, they had to ask—Is this our fight?

A Risk Worth Taking

During their meeting, the board spoke of the risk. If Pathfinder mounted a legal challenge, could it hurt the organization’s chances for federal funding, not just within PEPFAR (the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief), but beyond?

When they discussed how the restriction violated the First Amendment, Andrew Frey, a board member who specializes in Supreme Court litigation, rightly pointed out, “The Constitution is violated in some way or another every single day. We must decide if this particular constitutional violation is important enough to Pathfinder’s beliefs and concerns that it stands out from others, meriting action on our part. And if we do join the suit, we should do so with wholehearted commitment.”

The rest of the board agreed, and then added something critical. They noted the common thread between the board and Pathfinders everywhere—they are all compelled to support the world’s most underserved women. So in the final moments of the meeting, the board asked themselves, “Who is more underserved than a female sex worker in a developing country?”

Daniel Pellegrom, Pathfinder’s President and CEO from 1985 to 2011, remembers that question. “I also recall the pause—silence, really—that followed. Finally, someone said, ‘I think we are ready for a vote.’  The measure was moved, seconded, and passed. Pathfinder became co-plaintiff with AOSI (Alliance for Open Society International, Inc.) in a lawsuit against the US Government. There was not one opposing vote on the Pathfinder board.”

Courage is Communicable

“Without Pathfinder, the suit might have gone nowhere,” said Pellegrom. “No other organizations in our field seemed ready to seriously consider joining AOSI; the risk for them evidently outweighed the advantages. But AOSI needed help to meet the test of ‘standing’ in court. Since much of our work is supported by USAID, and we implement HIV and AIDS programs that target sex workers, Pathfinder was able to demonstrate how the pledge would limit our successful strategies in the fight against HIV and AIDS. Once Pathfinder took the plunge, more than 200 other organizations (under the umbrella of InterAction and Global Health Council) chose to align themselves with the case to take a stand.”

The case progressed with one court after another affirming Pathfinder’s stance. The US District Court for the Southern District of New York twice ruled that the pledge violated the First Amendment. In June 2006, the court issued a preliminary injunction, prohibiting USAID and the Department of Health and Human Services from enforcing the pledge against Pathfinder and AOSI. Two years later, the injunction was expanded to include the US-based members of the Global Health Council and InterAction, upon their becoming official co-plaintiffs in the suit.

In 2010, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the District Court’s decision that the pledge could not withstand heightened First Amendment scrutiny. Pathfinder was relieved, but continued its advocacy, believing the biggest test had yet to come.

Finally in April of 2013, more than seven years after Pathfinder’s board of directors took their vote, the Supreme Court of the United States heard the US Government’s appeal of Pathfinder’s lawsuit. In June, the court issued its important decision.

Victory

"This victory will enable us to continue to support the most underserved populations, treating them with the human dignity we all deserve and to do so without compromising any of our principles." -Purnima ManeThe US Supreme Court ruled 6-2 in Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society International, Inc., et al., holding that the anti-prostitution pledge violates the First Amendment and cannot be sustained. In his majority opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote that while Congress may attach conditions to federal funding that specify the activities Congress wishes to subsidize and require federal funds be used only for those purposes, a funding condition is impermissible if it intrudes on private speech outside the contours of the government program. The decision was a strong and resounding message in favor of Pathfinder and fellow co-plaintiffs, AOSI, Inc., InterAction, and Global Health Council, igniting celebrations among Pathfinder staff around the world.

Pathfinder’s current President and CEO, Purnima Mane, believes the victory speaks to the kind of organization Pathfinder is and always will be. “This victory will enable us to continue to support the most underserved populations, treating them with the human dignity we all deserve and to do so without compromising any of our principles. The onus is now upon us to do an even better job of getting services to all those who need them the most and are often denied access, and on doing so with greater impact and even better quality.”

And in India, where Pathfinder implements a successful project to fight HIV by empowering female sex workers, the verdict is a sign of things to come. “To be honest, I do not think many organizations in the US would have the stomach to do what we did!” said Darshana Vyas, Director of the Mukta project. “Our conviction and hard work all these years certainly paid off. This ruling is going to help marginalized and stigmatized populations we serve all over the world.”

Focus Area: Advocacy

Jonathan J. Rucks

Jonathan J. Rucks is Pathfinder International's Director of Advocacy.

Leave a Comment

* Change

Comments

It forced groups like Pathfinder to adopt an organization-wide policy, thereby restricting how they spend their own private funds to do HIV work. Prediksi
Name September 17, 2014
It is very true, people must learn how to learn before they can learnlive chat support
jack89 September 17, 2014
Nice post . Your post is really very nice . I appreciate your post . Keep it up. small packaging boxes
Harry smith September 17, 2014
I read your post . I want to say after read your excellent blog just i say its very interesting. Keep it up. My request is please share me more post in future . Stickersprinting.co.UK
Harry Smith September 17, 2014
I think I should also work hard for my own website like I see some good and updated working in your site. high pr links
jack89 September 16, 2014
why such information is for free here? Because when you write a book then at least on selling a book you get a percentage. Buy backlinks
jack89 September 16, 2014
This is really a nice and informative, containing all information and also has a great impact on the new technology. Thanks for sharing it. visit us
jordan September 16, 2014
I feel it's useful effort and this good for both man and woman as well and especially for women. I appreciate your work. You did work very well. Keep it up. visit this website
Tyler September 16, 2014
Nice post! This is a very nice blog that I will definitively come back to more times this year! Thanks for informative post. osteopaths & back pain
ALI September 15, 2014
why such information is for free here Because when you write a book then at least on selling a book you get a percentage wedding venues manchester
jack89 September 15, 2014
My spouse and i order an Nexon Soecie Code since this is the particular simply strategy They will become KARMA. karma koin to get make use of around the actual most up-to-date on the internet activities, such as typically the significantly spoke pertaining to Walnut Storyline. http://getfreekarmakoincodesnow.com
http://getfreekarmakoincodesnow.com September 15, 2014
When they discussed how the restriction violated the First Amendment, Andrew Frey, a board member who specializes in Supreme Court litigation, rightly pointed out http://www.nostal.co.il/Site.asp?table=Terms&option=single&serial=13297&subject=%E0%E9%F9%E9%ED%20%E1%EE%F4%F2%EC%20%E4%E4%F2%F4%EC%E4&portal=%E4%F2%F4%EC%E4%20%E5%EE%F2%F4%E9%EC%E9%ED
Name September 13, 2014
Very interesting discussion glad that I came across such informative post. Keep up the good work friend. Thanks for sharing. Buy gym mats for gyms
Jhonny September 12, 2014
Hey there thanks for showing me this. I must say that your blogpost was the most enjoying read I've seen in a long time. Greetings from how to be rich stop loss order world economy debt ceiling
Aditech September 12, 2014
You have a good point here!I totally agree with what you have said!!Thanks for sharing your views...hope more people will read this article!!! ira gold
Aaa September 11, 2014
All want justice from supreme court but i don't thing every one get it , all of us think about that.Buy Gym Mats
Anderson September 11, 2014
Awesome!! Many people undoubtedly applying many you will see definitely not considerable the suitable design along with Many of us otherwise have already ordered all people book-marked to find out brand-new merchandise all people snail e-mail easily obtainable. non slip flooring
Anderson September 11, 2014
The idea is to focus on facts and try and define a baseline problem to share.
Mobile News Gathering Solutions
aadi September 11, 2014
My husband and I found many campuses that we wished WE could have returned to vine vera reviews
jack89 September 11, 2014
I read your excellent post. I really appreciate your post. Thanks a lot for share this interesting post. Keep it up. Printinggood.co.UK
harry September 11, 2014
Scroll to top