In Defense of Misoprostol – Protecting Women’s Rights to Lifesaving Maternal Health Care

In 2011, the World Health Organization added the drug misoprostol to its Essential Medicines List for the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). Postpartum hemorrhage is the single greatest direct cause of maternal mortality, accounting for 25 percent of deaths worldwide. The addition of misoprostol represented a great step forward in global efforts to make delivery safer for women everywhere, especially in resource-poor settings, where women suffer disproportionately and treatment options are limited.

However, this month, a study was published in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine  that questions the WHO’s decision. Leading experts at Pathfinder International, including Ellen Israel and Cathy Solter, have carefully reviewed this new study and find its methodology flawed. Pathfinder also question its authors’ understanding of epidemiology and the realities of global maternal health. Misoprostol saves lives by contracting the uterus to reduce or stop bleeding, and is currently the only uterotonic that is heat stable, easily transportable, and easily administered. Pathfinder is deeply concerned that this study—despite its numerous deficiencies—might affect the availability of misoprostol, denying women access to the essential, lifesaving measure they need.

For more perspective on this study and information about the importance of misoprostol, read our newly released Technical Memo.

Media Contact

Please contact Kate Stookey, Director of Public Affairs, at 617-972-1231 or kstookey@pathfinder.org

Related News

Chinese delegation visit

Chinese delegation’s visit to the US signals final handover of project

A delegation of five senior Chinese government officials arrived in San Francisco, California on January 22, 2015 for a five-day visit, part of the Pathfinder International Changzhou Migrant Workers' Health and Wellness Project.

Federal Anti-Prostitution Pledge Violates Speech Rights of Public Health Groups’

Federal court decision rejects the federal government’s attempts to narrow the scope of the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2013 decision striking down as unconstitutional an Anti-Prostitution Pledge in the context of a U.S. government’s global program to combat the spread of HIV and AIDS.

Scroll to top